“…they were born in another time.”

I was led to this interesting blog post that was asking for some thoughts based on a letter that was sent by a parent discussing “technology and ch

ildhood”. Here is the email that was shared:

“I am a parent of two boys aged nine and six. One of the ongoing concerns within our family is technology and electronic devices. How do we safely allow technology to be a part of their, and our lives, and still let our children experience childhood? Does technology work in unison with childhood? Is technology so engulfed within our current society that we are required to partake whether we like it or not? I seem to be having an increasing number of conversations with other parents about technology and its implications on our, and in particular, our childrens’ lives. There seems to be varying opinions on how to approach it, how to utilise it and how to discipline it, especially in regards to social use and educational purposes. If you feel you have views to express in regards to this topic, then please use this as an oppurtunity for your experiences and ideas to be heard. My aim is to publish a complete text which will include shared stories from parents and teachers in relation to “Technology and Childhood”. I think by documenting families approaches we can not only learn from each other, guide and help eachother, but also record the current role that technology has in our childrens’ lives. Our young generations are going to be such a significant part of this country’s history. To a great extent they are “guinea pigs” to the social, physical and developmental outcomes of technology usage from a young age.

So what is your approach?

Since I wrote a long comment in response, I thought that I would share my thoughts on my blog as well. Below is what I shared:

Great questions here and I am going to jump in with a few thoughts.

1. Here is an interesting statement that grabbed my attention right away:
“How do we safely allow technology to be a part of their, and our lives, and still let our children experience childhood?”

I guess what I would ask right away is what have we determined as the notion of “childhood”? It is how we grew up or how kids are growing up now? If a kid played a board game would we better with that then a computer game? Both can be social but in a different way. If kids are reading, does it really matter if it is on an iPad or a paper book? We grew up with books and that was a new technology at some point that probably people were uncomfortable with. I think that when many see a kid using a digital device outside during recess, they are appalled, but when they see a kid reading a book, we commend them. In both situations there is good and bad and conversations that should happen with balance.

2. Imagination is extremely important but what happens when we can bring imagination to life? When I was a kid, playing with GI Joe figures was an awesome activity for me and I would act out scenes forever yet those scenes were only in my mind. What if I could actually create something on a computer that would allow others to recreate those scenes? Drawing my ideas was seen as great for brain development, so where does creating something on a computer fit into this? Imagination is fantastic but we have to also think about how we can give kids a creative outlet.

3. I think that this comment can be altered a touch:

“Our young generations are going to be such a significant part of this country’s history. “

The reality is that this generation is important to the ‘future’ of the country which should look different and grow from our past. The idea that kids are “guinea pigs” can be said for so many generations with different technologies, whether it it books, film, automobiles, telephones, or televisions. Do we grow up in an environment where there was no change or do society’s just continue to change, progress and evolve? I actually grew up with a computer that I would spend a ton of time on as a child. That definitely had an impact on my development, but I think that it gave me the opportunity to create in a way that others before couldn’t. Was it negative? Probably some things were negative and some were positive, but with every advance in society, we give some things up where we also gain. That leads me into my last thoughts on balance.

4. Balance is extremely important in this debate about what our kids are doing now. Ironically, I am writing this while watching the olympics which is a celebration of children that probably grew up with a gigantic lack of balance in their lives to be what many would consider to be successful. Is balance what we are aiming for or is it happiness, or is it both? I love this post by Will Richardson where he discusses the balance debate:

“…the reality is that most of those folks who are concerned about kids needing balance are out of balance themselves, just in the opposite way. They’re not online enough, not reading, writing, participating, connecting and creating in these spaces as much as they need to be to fully understand the implications of these technologies for their own learning and for the kids in their classrooms. Lately, when I’ve been responding to people about the “balance” question, I go with “well, actually, you’re out of balance too, you know.” Richardson

If we are really looking out for our kids, what experiences have we learned from using technology ourselves to help guide them through this unchartered territory. As someone who is an advocate for the use of technology in schools, I also am an advocate for exercise, connecting face-to-face, and trying different things. It is not that I am against the use of pencil, but I am against the lack of opportunity to have some meaningful opportunities to use technology in the classroom as well. We need to give kids Option A and B, not just provide one or the other.

The idea of “balance” is important so as Richardson discusses, let’s figure out how we can model this balance by embedding the effective use of technology in our lives while also learning to put it away when we should. By being able to model and understand both, we are more likely to seem credible in the discussions with our children.

With all of this being said, I believe that parents are doing their best to provide a life for their children that was better their own. I commend parents for asking these types of questions as these conversations are so important to improving the opportunities for our students in a safe way. In this whole discussion, this quote always sticks out to me:

“Do not confine your children to your own learning for they were born in another time.”

Thank you for the conversation!

These conversations are so important to our communities and obviously I am a big advocate for schools moving forward from when we went. I love the below picture which really shows how kids have moved away from how we are as children:

What are your thoughts on this topic? I encourage you to share your thoughts here or on the original blog post. These are such great conversations that we should be having with our school communities.


  1. “Do not confine your children to your own learning for they were born in another time.”

    That’s the saddest part of it all, because if they had been, they’d be much better people … less superficial, less materialistic, less self-entitled, and most importantly, not obsessed with collecting “friends” like some kids collect sports trading cards.

    People born during my time of learning valued bona fide vis-a-vis contact. This present generation does not. It will settle for compromise within an abstract construct called “social media ” because deep down, they do not possess the necessary moxie to face their world without the crutch of a keyboard or a screen to augment their being.

    I was recently interviewed and I was asked about social media. I told them that social media is mostly for people who can’t make contacts the tried and true tradition method of actually going places by needing a computer application to help them. That doesn’t say much about the character of the people who fill a big segment of our society, does it?

    The truth is … you aren’t going to learn anything more useful about your present job from some some guy in Zimbabwe than you will from a real person right down the hall of your school building or another teacher in your district.

    The presumption that just because an information contact was made on a global scale doesn’t make it more valuable compared to what can learn within your immediate physical sphere if you just try. Those are the teachers you know best. They are the ones sharing your issues. They are not strangers or disembodied figures appearing as dots on a screen.

    Which is why is doesn’t make sense to expect that someone in China or India can help you with your present situation … because THEY AREN’T IN YOUR PRESENT SITUATION and THEY DON’T KNOW YOUR SCHOOL or its kids. By the same token, I would never presume that I could ever give anyone from China or India any useful advice. Our cultures, methods, and standards are 180 degree opposites.

    The same could be said about a teacher from Oregon and a teacher from Louisiana. The cultural and educational gulf is too wide to make any exchange worth the time.

    I would also wager that many of you are more interested in discovering how much information you can gather from your global contacts rather than being more judicious and making far fewer contacts and selection for this simple reason … there’s only so much time in a day, that is, if you have a real life beyond your job. Based on my observations, I would wager that a majority of those who are among the self-styled “leaders” in the blogosphere do not have a life outside their jobs. They can’t if they are twitting and tweeting and edblathering every day or fretting over their “brand.”

    August 18, 2012

Comments are closed.